• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

An estimate that arrives instantly should be treated as a bad sign. A competent team returns clarifying questions before any number: about users and volumes. A supplier that quotes with no clarification is guessing, and that guess resurfaces as a change order — on your budget.

Be wary of a mismatch between the team in the pitch and the people who will code. Request the names and CVs of the actual team in the statement of work, with a provision that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A vendor that talks only about roles and will not commit to individuals is preserving its own flexibility at your cost.

Require access to the repository from day one. A provider that shows code only at milestones is asking you to accept a black box. Regular commits and pull requests tell you who is really on the project far better than a slide deck. The same applies to the build and deployment setup: if there is no pipeline, quality claims remain just talk.

Vague contract language around code ownership is never an accident. The agreement must state in plain terms that the code, designs and documentation become the property of the client upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Check also the jurisdiction and the payment schedule: heavy prepayment with no milestone tied to it eliminates your only leverage.

Last, look at the working rhythm. Ask how many hours you will share with your timezone, which is better laravel or symfony named person is expected to answer day-to-day questions and laravel vs .net comparison how quickly. Some genuine overlap is usually enough; none at all converts each small question into a twenty-four hour round trip. Sloppy written English in house vs outsourcing software development the sales phase will not improve under delivery pressure.