• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Begin with proven experience, not the length of the client list. Ask for a couple of engagements that sit close to your technology stack, and then ask whether those engineers are still with the company. An honest provider will introduce you to the tech lead. Evasive answers at this stage usually mean you are talking to a reseller.

The agreement warrants a slower read than the pitch. Three sections matter more than the rest: ownership of the code, the NDA, and termination and handover. Every artifact should transfer to you on payment, laravel vs django performance together with documentation, pipelines and deployment scripts. Look closely at language that keeps reusable components in the vendor's hands, because this is frequently the dependency that makes switching painful.

Find out how the estimate was built. A credible estimate is accompanied by a written set of assumptions, a breakdown by feature or module and an explicit range. A fixed-price contract only makes sense when the scope is genuinely frozen; when the scope is still moving the provider prices the risk in and performance php vs python you pay for it anyway. Time and materials shifts that risk to you, so it demands visible weekly reporting and a spending cap.

How the work is run matters more than team size. Establish how a new requirement enters the plan, who signs off on a feature and how we work with clients what the QA setup looks like. A well-run team can demonstrate a working build every one or two weeks. Acceptance criteria in writing stay the only reliable protection against endless rounds of rework.

Finally, think about the day you no longer need this vendor at the start rather than at the end. Ask that the code repository stays under your account from the beginning, and that a readme and architecture notes are kept current as the code changes. A vendor with nothing to hide will agree quickly; resistance at this point reveals quite a lot.